Loading...
Moving forward with time series analysis
Enns, Peter K. ; Kelly, Nathan J. ; Masaki, Takaaki ; Wohlfarth, Patrick C.
Enns, Peter K.
Kelly, Nathan J.
Masaki, Takaaki
Wohlfarth, Patrick C.
Abstract
In a recent Research and Politics article, we showed that for many types of time series data, concerns about spurious relationships can be overcome by following standard procedures associated with cointegration tests and the general error correction model (GECM). Matthew Lebo and Patrick Kraft (LK) incorrectly argue that our recommended approach will lead researchers to identify false (i.e., spurious) relationships. In this article, we show how LK's response is incorrect or misleading in multiple ways. Most importantly, when we correct their simulations, their results reinforce our previous findings, highlighting the utility of the GECM when estimated and interpreted correctly.
Description
Date
2017-10-04
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Collections
Download Dataset
Rights Holder
Usage License
Embargo
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Citation
Advisor
Department
Government
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017732231
