Loading...
what exactly are you inferring? A closer look at hypothesis testing
Newman, MC
Newman, MC
Abstract
This critical review describes the confused application of significance tests in environmental toxicology and chemistry that often produces incorrect inferences and indefensible regulatory decisions. Following a brief review of statistical testing theory, nine recommendations are put forward. The first is that confidence intervals be used instead of hypothesis tests whenever possible. The remaining recommendations are relevant if hypothesis tests are used. They are as follows: Define and justify Type I and II error rates a priori; set and justify an effect size a priori; do not confuse p(E vertical bar H-0) and p(H-0 vertical bar E); design tests permitting Positive Predictive Value estimation; publish negative results; estimate a priori, not post hoe, power; as warranted by study goals, favor null hypotheses that are not conventional nil hypotheses; and avoid definitive inferences from isolated tests.
Description
Date
2008-01-01
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Collections
Download Dataset
Files
Loading...
07_373.1.pdf
Adobe PDF, 113.71 KB
Rights Holder
Usage License
Embargo
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Physical Sciences Peer-Reviewed Articles, Confidence-Intervals; Published Research; Epidemiology; Probability; False; Power
Citation
Advisor
Department
Virginia Institute of Marine Science
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1897/07-373.1