Objective: The purpose was to examine motor imagery-induced enhancement in corticospinal excitability during a reaction time (RT) task. Methods: Nine young and healthy Subjects performed an isometric finger flexion tasks in response to a visual imperative cue. In the pre-cue period, they were instructed to: (I) rest; (2) imagine flexing their fingers isometrically (ImFlex): or (3) imagine extending their fingers isometrically (ImExt). Surface EMGs from the finger flexors and extensors were monitored to ensure EMG silence before movement onset. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to evaluate changes in motor-evoked potentials (MEP) in the finger flexor and extensor muscles during the response phase. TMS was delivered either with the imperative cue, or 120 ms before and after the imperative cue. Results: RT was slower when they were imagining finger extension prior to the visual imperative cue. MEPs were significantly increased for the finger flexors during imagined finger flexion and for the finger extensors during imagined finger extension at both TMS delivery time points, reflecting movement specific enhancement in corticospinal excitability during motor imagery. When TMS was delivered 120 ms after the cue, finger flexor MEN were further facilitated under the Rest and ImFlex conditions, but not under the ImExt condition, suggesting additive interactions between imagery-induced enhancement and early rise in corticospinal excitability during the initiation of a reaction time response. Conclusions: Our results provide neurophysiological evidence mediating dynamic interactions between imagined movement and the initiation of voluntary movement. Significance: Motor imagery can be integrated into a rehabilitation protocol to facilitate motor recovery. (C) 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Li, S., Stevens, J. A., & Rymer, W. Z. (2009). Interactions between imagined movement and the initiation of voluntary movement: a TMS study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(6), 1154-1160.