Document Type
Article
Department/Program
Art & Art History
Journal Title
nonsite.org
Pub Date
6-2011
Issue
2
Abstract
Things remain visible to people outside the visuality within which they were intentionally produced, though what is visible in an artifact in this context (or what is visible about it) may differ from what is visible in the context of visuality. By the same token, people can succeed to many visualities, though both Wölfflin and Panofsky were somewhat uncertain (on different grounds) about just how far it is possible to do so when we are dealing with visualities constituted in the past and accessible to us only in things made to be visible within them that happen to have survived into our own visual world.
Recommended Citation
Palermo, Charles J., Responses to Davis, “Neurovisuality” (2011). nonsite.org.
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/aspubs/1946