Date Awarded
2023
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Education (Ed.D.)
Department
Education
Advisor
Christopher R. Gareis
Committee Member
Margaret E. Constantino
Committee Member
Leslie W. Grant
Abstract
The International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma Programme is an international college-preparatory program that offers two levels of participation: IB diploma candidate and IB course candidate. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in college-related outcome achievement between these groups so that students and stakeholders can make informed decisions about their level of participation in the IB program. Quantitative data was collected and analyzed using statistical tests to compare the college acceptance, enrollment, retention, and graduation rates, as well as the time to college graduation, of IB diploma candidates and IB course candidates. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups on college acceptance rate, with IB course candidates having a higher acceptance rate. There was not a statistically significant difference between the groups on the other four outcomes. However, the outcomes of the IB students in the sample as a whole were high, indicating that the IB program leads to college success. It is recommended that students be encouraged to participate in the IB program, that students be allowed to choose their level of participation in the IB program, and that steps be taken to give students the skills necessary to enroll in IB classes. The results of this study inform all stakeholders, but they especially empower students to choose how they participate in the IB program not out of a perceived benefit when it comes to college, but based on what they want out of their high school experience.
DOI
https://dx.doi.org/10.25774/w4-wmqs-7w28
Rights
© The Author
Recommended Citation
Carroll, Nikki, "A Comparison Of The College Success Of International Baccalaureate Diploma Candidates And Course Candidates" (2023). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. William & Mary. Paper 1717521706.
https://dx.doi.org/10.25774/w4-wmqs-7w28