Document Type

Thesis

Abstract

Years of over-fishing, combined with increased nutrient pollution, have had a catastrophic effect on the ecology of the Chesapeake Bay. The Holocene record of Bay mollusks may provide a useful baseline for ecological restoration, but the effects of preservational bias on these assemblages must first be assessed. This study addresses two questions: (1) What types of shell damage occur in the death assemblages of Bay benthic mollusks and (2) How does shell damage differ according to shell mineralogy, life habit, and geographic location? To conduct this study, we focused on four sites distributed within the main channel and the major tributaries of the upper Chesapeake Bay. Death assemblage material was collected using WildCo and modified box cores, sieved through a series of four mesh sizes (4mm, 2mm, Imm, 0.5mm), and temporarily preserved in formalin solution. Identifiable shells and fragments were assigned taphonomic damage states based on categorical scoring systems. Data collection techniques were standardized with past taphonomic studies to allow for comparisons. Data on the following variables were collected from both internal and external shell surfaces (where applicable): (1) bioerosion, (2) encrustation, (3) periostracum loss, (4) drilling, (5) disarticulation, (6) fragmentation, (7) fine-scale alteration (FSA), (8) and edge-modification. Type of encruster, driller, and/or bioeroder was also noted. The overall goal of this research is to examine the pattern and extent of taphonomic damage in benthic mollusks in the Chesapeake Bay. If taphonomic (preservational) bias differs according to geography, mineralogy, or life habit, the Holocene record would be similarly biased. However, if this bias was random, it is possible to accurately reconstruct the Holocene mollusk community.

Date Awarded

2004

Department

Geology

Advisor 1

Rowan Lockwood

Download

Share Feedback

Share

COinS