Date Thesis Awarded
4-2019
Access Type
Honors Thesis -- Access Restricted On-Campus Only
Degree Name
Bachelors of Arts (BA)
Department
Government
Advisor
Jackson N. Sasser, Jr.
Committee Members
Christine Nemacheck
Adam Gershowitz
Abstract
A neutral evaluation of the modern death penalty, a fundamentally flawed institution, necessitates its invalidation. I analyze 428 death sentences and their appellate outcomes from Virginia, Texas, California, Pennsylvania, Colorado, and Wyoming, states which represent the gamut of capital punishment regimes in the United States. Employing a legal framework derived from the work of Justice Antonin Scalia—a lifelong and staunch supporter of the death penalty—I argue that the harmonious-reading canon and irreconcilability canons offer a neutral means for ending the American death penalty, and one which would be appropriate given the politicization of what is an irreversible punishment.
Recommended Citation
Whitehurst, Carson A., ""Full of Internal Contradictions": A Neutral Case for the Invalidation of the Death Penalty" (2019). Undergraduate Honors Theses. William & Mary. Paper 1306.
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1306