Date Thesis Awarded
5-2022
Access Type
Honors Thesis -- Open Access
Degree Name
Bachelors of Arts (BA)
Department
History
Advisor
Charles McGovern
Committee Members
Jay T. Watkins, III
Frederick C. Corney
Mitchell D. Brown
Abstract
This paper assesses why two projects with the same name, concept and intent of forming cultural consensus, the Freedom Trains, took such different forms between the postwar "consensus" (1947-1963) and detente (1963-1979) phases of the Cold War. It argues that organizers Attorney General Tom C. Clark (1947), Ross Rowland (1975), and their corporate backers articulated histories based on perceived common values of limited rights (1947), cultural pluralism (1975) and consumption (both) that attempted unity, but resulted in silences. The reception to each train, and the organizers' responses to those reactions, showed the limitations of a unifying consensus, but varied between the two periods. Finally, the paper examines how the strength and type of recollection of both trains by the public (and efforts by government leaders, civic groups, and Ross Rowland to shape those memories) varied across time, and argues that the relatively limited recollection reflects the weakness of the only organized mythology of the Cold War, the "good versus evil" teleological narrative.
Recommended Citation
Speer, Daniel, "The Rails that Bind: America's Freedom Trains as Reflections of Efforts to Form Cultural Consensus and Indicators of the Weakness of Cold War Memory" (2022). Undergraduate Honors Theses. William & Mary. Paper 1869.
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1869
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
