Date Thesis Awarded

5-2011

Access Type

Honors Thesis -- Access Restricted On-Campus Only

Degree Name

Bachelors of Arts (BA)

Department

English

Advisor

Suzanne C. Hagedorn

Committee Members

John W. Conlee

Erin Minear

Philip Daileader

Abstract

In recent scholarship of fifteenth-century Middle Scots poetry, critics have largely rejected the term "Scottish Chaucerians," arguing that the category implies mere translation or imitation of Chaucer's works. This paper, however, aims to explore the possibility that Chaucerian sources remain pivotal in the study of Middle Scots poetry, and offer an new definition of the term "Scottish Chaucerians" that reflects these poets' inventiveness. Through fresh readings of Robert Henryson's and William Dunbar's longer narrative poems, this paper will examine the way in which the Scottish "makars" engage with Chaucerian discussions of gender politics. Rather than merely imitating Chaucer, however, these poets revise and reinterpret his works according to their individual poetic aims. Thus, the category of "Scottish Chaucerians" becomes a term for the tradition-conscious innovation of Henryson and Dunbar.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.

Comments

Thesis is part of Honors ETD pilot project, 2008-2013. Migrated from Dspace in 2016.

Download

Share Feedback

On-Campus Access Only

Share

COinS